🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over System and Ideology

For example, it was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss them for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then discard them for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.